Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues.  Discover more  is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.


This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts.  Proteck'd Apparel  would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.